NAAC – Btibangalore

NAAC

IIQA

SSR

CRITERION 1

CRITERION 2

CRITERION 3

CRITERION 4

CRITERION 5

CRITERION 6

CRITERION 7

Extended Profile

Best Practices

Institutional Distinctiveness

IIQA

SSR

CRITERION 1

CRITERION 1 – Curricular Aspects (100).

Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation (20)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
1.1.1 QlM	The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal Assessment	20

Key Indicator – 1.2 Academic Flexibility (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
1.2.1 QnM	Number of Certificate/Value added courses offered and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years)	15
1.2.2 QnM	Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. as against the total number of students during the last five years	15

Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
1.3.1 QlM	Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability in transacting the Curriculum	10
1.3.2 QnM	Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year)	20

Key Indicator – 1.4 Feedback System (20)

METRIC NO.

DESCRIPTION

WEIGHTAGE

1.4.1
QnM

Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website

Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows:
A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken& communicated to the relevant bodies and feedback hosted on the institutional website
B. Feedback collected, analyzed and action has been taken and communicated to the relevant bodies
C. Feedback collected and analyzed
D. Feedback collected
E. Feedback not collected

20

CRITERION 2

CRITERION 2 – Teaching Learning and Evaluation (350)

Key Indicator – 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
2.1.1 QnM	Enrolment percentage	20
2.1.2 QnM	Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years	20

Key Indicator – 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio (40).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
2.2.1 QnM	Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)	40

Key Indicator – 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (40).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
2.3.1 QlM	Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process	40

Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
2.4.1 QnM	Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years	15
2.4.2 QnM	Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)	25

Key Indicator – 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (40).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
2.5.1 QlM	Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient	40

Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
2.6.1 QlM	Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website	25
2.6.2 QlM	Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated.	20
2.6.3 QnM	Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students)	45

Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
2.7.1 QnM	Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.	60

CRITERION 3

CRITERION 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension (110)

Key Indicator- 3.1 Resource Mobilization for Research (10)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
3.1.1 QnM	Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years.	10

Key Indicator- 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem (15).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
3.2.1 QlM	Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident	10
3.2.2 QnM	Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years	5

Key Indicator- 3.3 Research Publication and Awards (25).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
3.3.1 QnM	Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years	10
3.3.2 QnM	Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years	15

Key Indicator- 3.4 Extension Activities (40).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
3.4.1 QlM	Outcomes of Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues for their holistic development during the last five years.	15
3.4.2 QlM	Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognized bodies.	5
3.4.3 QnM	Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years	20

Key Indicator- 3.5 Collaboration (20).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
3.5.1 QnM	Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years	20

CRITERION 4

CRITERION 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100).

Key Indicator – 4.1 Physical Facilities (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
4.1.1 QlM	The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities for a. teaching – learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc b. ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc. Facilities for Cultural and sports activities, yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor), Gymnasium, auditorium etc	20
4.1.2 QnM	Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years	10

Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a learning Resource (20).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
4.2.1 QlM	Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students	20

Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
4.3.1 QlM	Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection	20
4.3.2 QnM	Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)	10

Key Indicator – 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
4.4.1 QnM	Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years	20

CRITERION 5

CRITERION 5 – Student Support and Progression (140).

Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support (50)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.1.1 QnM	Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years	20
5.1.2 QnM	Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organized for improving students’ capability 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, selfemployment and entrepreneurial skills) 4. Awareness of trends in technology	10
5.1.3 QnM	Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years	10
5.1.4 QnM	The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees	10

Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression (35).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.2.1 QnM	Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years	25
5.2.2 QnM	Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years	10

Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (45).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.3.1 QnM	Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level during the last five years	20
5.3.2 QnM	Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years	25

Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.4.1 QlM	There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services	10

CRITERION 6

CRITERION 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management (100).

Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.1.1 QlM	The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan.	15

Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (12).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.2.1 QlM	The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc.	8
6.2.2 QnM	Institution implements e-governance in its operations 1. Administration including complaint management 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examinations	4

Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (33).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.3.1 QlM	The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression	6
6.3.2 QnM	Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years	12
6.3.3 QnM	Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years	15

Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (10).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.4.1 QlM	Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external)	10

Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.5.1 QlM	Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities	15
6.5.2 QnM	Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements 2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) / membership of international networks 3. Participation in NIRF 4. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc	15

CRITERION 7

CRITERION 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100).

Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
7.1.1 QlM	Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years.	10
7.1.2 QnM	The Institution has facilities and initiatives for 1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures 2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste 3. Water conservation 4. Green campus initiatives 5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment	20
7.1.3 QnM	Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following 1. Green audit / Environment audit 2. Energy audit 3. Clean and green campus initiatives 4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities	10
7.1.4 QlM	Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens	10

Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
7.2.1 QlM	Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual	30

Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
7.3.1 QlM	Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words	20

Extended Profile

Best Practices

Institutional Distinctiveness

DVV Clarification

CRITERION 5

CRITERION 6

CRITERION 7

EXTENDED PROFILE

CRITERION 5

CRITERION 5 – Student Support and Progression (140).

Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support (50)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.1.1 QnM	Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years	20
5.1.2 QnM	Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organized for improving students’ capability 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, selfemployment and entrepreneurial skills) 4. Awareness of trends in technology	10
5.1.3 QnM	Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years	10
5.1.4 QnM	The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees	10

Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression (35).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.2.1 QnM	Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years	25
5.2.2 QnM	Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years	10

Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (45).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.3.1 QnM	Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level during the last five years	20
5.3.2 QnM	Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years	25

Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
5.4.1 QlM	There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services	10

CRITERION 6

CRITERION 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management (100).

Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.1.1 QlM	The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan.	15

Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (12).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.2.1 QlM	The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc.	8
6.2.2 QnM	Institution implements e-governance in its operations 1. Administration including complaint management 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examinations	4

Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (33).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.3.1 QlM	The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression	6
6.3.2 QnM	Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years	12
6.3.3 QnM	Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years	15

Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (10).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.4.1 QlM	Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external)	10

Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
6.5.1 QlM	Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities	15
6.5.2 QnM	Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements 2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) / membership of international networks 3. Participation in NIRF 4. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc	15

CRITERION 7

CRITERION 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100).

Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
7.1.1 QlM	Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years.	10
7.1.2 QnM	The Institution has facilities and initiatives for 1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures 2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste 3. Water conservation 4. Green campus initiatives 5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment	20
7.1.3 QnM	Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following 1. Green audit / Environment audit 2. Energy audit 3. Clean and green campus initiatives 4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities	10
7.1.4 QlM	Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens	10

Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices (30).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
7.2.1 QlM	Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual	30

Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20).

METRIC NO.	DESCRIPTION	WEIGHTAGE
7.3.1 QlM	Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words	20

EXTENDED PROFILE

Support BTI Bangalore

× How can I help you?